Участник:Роман Сергеевич Сидоров

Роман Сергеевич Сидоров

Myself and my cat

Псевдонимы

Роман Сергеев

Дата рождения

5 октября 1999 года

Место рождения

Смоленск, Смоленская область, Российская Федерация

Язык произведений

английский, русский, латинский

Основные интересы

Фонология английского языка, Французская фонология, Лексикология, Домоводство, Сантехника, Логика, Математика, История рабочего движения

Сайт

https://romansidorovnews.bitrix24site.ru/

Roman Sergeyevich Sidorov (born 5 October 1999) is a Russian Wikipedian and university student. Since 2022, I've been an active user of English Wikipedia, although I'm accustomed to violating the rules of this reactionary encyclopedia, making ideological subversions in the articles of this encyclopedia. My subversions in Ruwiki are less successful. I must confess that almost all the existing wikiprojects are my abhorrence, because they've been suppressing the most basic bourgeois democratic rights. I'm certainly more or less well-versed in labour disputes, English phonology. Some of my thoughts about English phonology are very metaphysical, though.

At Smolensk State University, I learnt some Latin, and French. My Latinity wasn't perfect, even though I spoke Latin much better than my Latin teacher. In 2017, I managed to write a couple of articles in Latin, although there were lots of grammatical and lexicographical mistakes in them. In 2024, I helped university students to do their Latin homework. In the same year, I was exceptionally active in otvety-mail.ru. In this website, I wrote lots of answers on literature, history, philology, linguistics, but I abandoned using this website, due to to its reactionary policies.

By the way, my French pronunciation was exceptionally native-like, so I'm used to being proud of this fact. My vocabulary was rather minuscule, though. This fact has been incredibly important in my life, in my opinion.

Initially, I was a student of Smolensk State University, but I had a conflict with its officials and reactionary university teachers, so I changed the university in 2023. Since 2023, I've been a student of Moscow International University. So far as I left Smolensk State University, I began publicizing lots of materials, compromising my former university. My integrity being unvarying, several platforms, like Yandex, censored and edited out my scathing invectives against my former university, a nest of obscurantism and reaction. Nevertheless, I don't give, so it's my destiny to battle past my former university, and it must be confessed that I'm unaffectedly rejoiced that the sycophants and blimps from Smolensk State University labelled all my merciless invectives against their university as 'subersive'. Their attempts to remove my critique from the corresponding articles were entirely abortive, due to Wikipedia's policies towards anonymous editors.

Since 2021, I have been one of the most active users of Tandem, according to the public sentiment, although my popularity has been gradually decreasing. I consider this application to be the best one, because there're lots of people in HelloTalk, Speaky who affronted me. My opinion on Reddit, Instagram, VK, Facebook, and Twitter is also negative, for all these social media have become censored, so once I was banned in the VK, for I disseminate the truth about Smolensk State University. My presence is therefore very limited in them, owing to the insane repressions against the basic bourgeois democratic rights.

My interests concern linguistics, hard sciences, history and literature.

My personal history

My schooldays

 → Участник:Роман Сергеевич Сидоров/My schooldays

Nikolai Ivanovich Sidorov was my paternal grandfather. His domestic virtues exceeded his public ones. My late grandfather was a tailor. In his school days, he was one of the best pupils, owing to his brilliant mental capacities. By nature he was very calm, reasonable, principled and stoic. Sofia Andreyevna Sidorova (née Titkova), my paternal grandmother wasn't that learned, but, according to my parents accounts, the catalogue of her virtues comprised wisdom, and the fancy for justice. Their place of abode was Agaponovough, an average Russian village, secretive and silent.

My father was a worker. Initially, he was a turner. My mother is still working as a librarian. Historically, all my ancestors were honest labourers, so I'm especially proud of the members of my family, the alive and the deceased. I have found my parents' integrity unimpeachable, and their diligence I have found unvarying.

I attended one of the most unpleasant schools in the Industrial district of Smolensk. My school wasn't a grammar school, so my present education is insanely, terribly poor. I don't like the school, and all the recollections on my schooldays, are quite terrifying, even though I was used to painting and drawing a lot in my schooldays. I left the primary school in 2017. I was so disappointed with my education that I began reading classical Russian authors, including Dostoevsky and Griboedov. I was a huge fan of Dostoevsky, therefore I was used to learning passages from his novels by heart.

Zoya Nikolayevna Smolyakova

I was an average Russian schoolboy, because the crosspatches of my school was used to praising me until 2015. I wouldn't say that my industry and obedience were excellent, so I wasn't a charmer at all. To my thinking, I was extremely scornful and arrogant during my school days, although it must be confessed that I didn't war with my classmates. My conflicts with the teaching staff were very frequent between 2015 and 2016. I did abhor Zoya Nikolayevna Smolyakova, my Russian teacher, the darndest crosspatch of my school. Her approach to estimating even approximately the intellectual faculties of her students was so funny and formalistic that I couldn't help cracking jokes in her presence. I really hated literature and Russian grammar at school because of this very unkind and incompetent teacher. I'm not trying to say that she was totally incompetent in comparison with other teachers. In 2017, she apologized to me, so I was very surprised with her words.

Zoya Nikolayevna Smolyakova's approach to literature was very formalistic, semi-decadent, so, in theory, we'd got to read Balmont, Severyanin, Gumilyov, Achmatova and stuff, so my distaste to literature was reasonable and explicable in a way. All in all, she wasn't the worst teacher, though her injustice, deafness, her poor knowledge of literary criticism was a great impediment, a drag on the development of my personality. I guess, it's noticeable that Smolyakova didn't read Plutarch's Parallel lives, just because it's totally impossible to be quite unjust after having read about a mighty, severe, heroic figure of Lucius Brutus, to say nothing of Poplicola and Solon. It's also noticeable that this teacher wasn't well-read because her speech wasn't enriched with witticisms, by-words.

I remember how I exclaimed against Zoya Nikolayevna's reactionary views during the lesson. After her faithful disciple's reading how Solzhenitsyn praised fascists, I venture to criticize him, because she asked me with her darting pig's eyes, her voice was a shade too loud. I told her that this writer is one of the symbols of bourgeois counterrevolution. I knew that Zoya Nikolayevna loathed this sort of thing. In my estimation, she abhorred me because I was accustomed to deriding her as indirectly as possible, so, in my eyes, she was always unable to maintain authority. And I always wonder why she charmed lots of disciple with her poor intellectual capacities.

However, Zoya Nikolayevna wasn't the worst teacher of my school. The worst ones were the chemistry teacher, quite a big woman, suffering from apathy, and Moiseenko Sergey Eduardovich, a humorous physics teacher. The two teachers taught nothing, so I ain't got no notions of chemistry and physics at all, except electricity. Moiseyenko was used to acting the fool during the classes, so the most of students really enjoyed his silly, antiintellectualistic jokes. I didn't like him, so he disliked me too. My face was always pretty unhappy during his classes, so he called me "an amateur of the Citrus", one day. As far as I remember, Moiseyenko had got large glasses which didn't make an intellectual. On the contrary, those glasses stultify him because his eyes expressed stupidity and idiotism. He was also quite handy, tricky and extremely cunning, for he was a blue boy of head teacher, so his paycheck was quite immense, despite his exceeding ignorance and idle talks.

In my schooldays, I was very addicted to drawing and painting very often. I wasn't definitely untalented, and a great deal of my works of art were drawn with frest vigour, vividness, but all of them were technically imperfect, because I was totally uneducated. In other words, drawing was just my pet hobby. My tastes in terms of drawing and painting weren't vulgar, incredibly blatant, because I always hated Shilov. It's possible to find some of my works of art in otvet.mail.ru. This user page isn't my website, so I'm not going to upload them.

My summer vacations in Agaponovo

In 2013, I drew lots of portraits of the residents of Agaponovough, the village of my ancestors. For instance, I drew Lidia Sergeyevna Balan, Sofia Lukinishna Belenkova, Nikolai Anatolyevich Belenkov, my neighbours in Agaponovo. The afore-mentioned sketches were predominantly illustration for my humorous short stories, a collection of gossips, fables from the life of alkies, lumpfens, pensioners. Despite very strong realistic tendencies, the drawings were drawn naively and chaotically. From the class point of view, the worthiest of drawing was the sketch with the mien of Lidia Sergeyevna Balan. She was rather a contradictory person, but, in the Soviet Union, she was a top dairymaid the local sovkhoz, so in the 1980s Lidia Sergeyevna became a deputy, despite her exceeding incompetence in the province of laws. Her face in my sketch is puzzled and reflective. As for Nikolay Anatolyevich Belenkov, an indolent busybody whose laziness goes beyond measure, once I portrayed him in the royal garments, with the Austrian crown. Later on, I improved my drawing skills, but, in the province of ideas, my artworks became miserable. You know, despite numerous imperfections, classical Greek statutes, the bust of Lucius Brutus were much better than all the statues of swinish August, Tiberius, Antinous, despite their more perfect forms. I guess, the same happens with my artworks.

Between 2013 and 2016, I was greatly interested in the local dialect. It's therefore possible to find lots of attempt to write down the phonetic singularities of Agaponovough's govor in my 'short stories'. I could speak some Smolensk dialect, although I have abandoned all the attempts to change my Russian pronunciation because of my scientific views.

The most ignorant teachers of my school

My history teachers were Galina Dmitrievna Globa, a dim-witted, dogmatical, emotionally disturbed, flabby crosspatch famous for her semi-religious fancy for conspiracy theories, reactionary right-wing social-democratism, poor and antiscientific knowledge of Soviet history, Anna Nikolayevna Mazyar, a knockout, boisterous bombshell, Vadim Vladmirovich Zhukov, a former policeman. My marks in history were always positive, excellent, but my opinion on the competence of teachers wasn't very positive. The first and the second instructresses humiliated me greatly. Globa was quite dissaffected with my suffocating cough, so she expelled me from a classroom several times. Mazyar forced me to teach the children instead of herself because I raised, held out my hand two times to ask her a question. I think that Mazyar punished me so cruelly because of her monarcho-fascist views. As for Zhukov, he was always quite cunning, double-tongued, although his mental equipment was better than those of Mazyar and Globa, However, his petty bourgeois subjectivism, fake intellectualism, ridiculous peacockery invoked fits of disgust. At least, it was blatantly obvious that Zhukov is the careerist of the first water. He wasn't as scatter-brained, as distracted as Globa.

Galina Dmitrievna Globa was a dim-witted crosspatch whose attempts to humiliate were unavailing. first of all, she wasn't a professional history teacher, because she worked as an archeologist. Step by step, I realized that she was an callous blackguard, although this process was very gradual. She taught Roman history in the most superficial manner, although we learnt a lot about Egyptian gods and godesses, Egyptian rites and etc. Mark my words, she tortured us with useless details while she was completely unable to tell us the contradictory history of class struggle.

Inna Leonidovna Kobryanova, my mathematics teacher, was also quite bad at teaching algebra and geometry, so her explanations were quite unintelligible, obscure. Later, in high school, she deceived and cheated the pupils. Her approach to teaching mathematics was quite formalistic because she didn't care about the gaps in pupils' knowledge. She was permanently hasty while explaining. In the last grade, my mother reproached her because of her unjustice towards me. Inna Leonidovna told my mother that I should have cheated and cabbaged during her tests to get a better result. I also remember that Kobryanova abhorred the working class. I really laughed at her when she said that Eltsyn was a nice president.

Galina Viktorovna Syomochkina, my second physical education teacher, was quite an illiterate teacher who damaged my health very seriously. She was quite a fat woman, so she was unable to chin the bar, do push-ups, press-ups, run. Pedagogically, she tortured the whole class with her caprices. Galina Viktorovna was also always accessible to bribes.

The brilliant exception

My geography teacher was quite a brilliant exception. I really adored Pakhomenkova Elena Trofimovna, among the most deserving of school teachers, I found unchanging affection in her dialectics. Despite her conservative or social-conservative views, her negative opinion on Stalin's purges, Elena Trofimovna always tried to teach how to think independently. I resisted greatly her attempts to make my direction of thought more dialectical. My views on the world were greatly metaphysical, in a word. I'm indebted to this good teacher in a way, because I'm not that bad at geography, although I'm not a specialist.

Why I chose my speciality

In my early days, I become interested in linguistics through history. I've been a fan of John Churchill, an English general and politician, so my political views had been very conservative, right-wing and reactionary for a very long while. Only in 2017, I stopped supporting the old international system of colonial exploitation, very archaic and dated political institutions. I was so interested in studying Churchill's biography that I was used to falsifying his biography with writing fictitious letters and editing English Wikipedia.

In my early youth, my views on art were greatly reactionary, for my favourite artist was William-Adolphe Bouguereau. I was also fond of Thomas Lawrence, Jan Matejko. At the same time, I was always very critical about abstractionism, surrealism (currently, I'm a staunch supporter of socialist realism in art).

With all its numerous vices, disadvantages, my school teachers were samples of learning and paragons of virtues in comparison with rabid bigots with scientific degrees, so my opinion on my schooldays is moderately positive in comparison with the ebullient emotions always invoked by my first university. My first university really deprived me of the blossom of my youth. On the other hand, I became a great supporter of workers' cause because of Smolensk State University. In the course of my late schooldays, I became quite a convinced stalinist, although my stalinism was quite bourgeois and antiproletarian.

Smolensk State University

My education

 → Участник:Роман Сергеевич Сидоров/My education

I wouldn't say that I passed the Unified state exam perfectly, therefore free higher education wasn't accessible to me. I passed social studies very poorly, in my estimation because this exam was the most stultifying one.

I enrolled in Smolensk State University in 2017. From 2017 to 2020, I learnt Latin. I was used to reciting very long passages from the Vulgata. I was quite unable to read Cicero, Varro, various classical Roman poets, just because their wording was too complicated and obscure. My marks were quite good in the very beginning. Say rather, I was honoured with an excellent mark in linguistics by Yulia Nikolarvna Vlasova. In 2018, I began learning French professionally, and, accordingly, I was so successful that my French teacher thought that I should enter one of Moscow universities. I studied philosophy, Late Middle English at my university. I read a lot, according to a set of sources. I've been used to reading and studying Lenin, Plekhanov, Marx, and Russell, and Kant. As for literary productions, I read Walter Scott's "Marmion", "Bridal of Triermain", Shakespeare's "King Lear", Christopher Marlow's "Jew of Malta", "Tamburlaine, Part I" in 2018. I was very dissatisfied with the literary productions written by Marlow, so I didn't finish reading Marlow's "Hero and Leander". In my early university days, I used Kachalova's grammar for learning English grammar. Nowadays I don't use this textbook very often because this grammar is very different from modern English grammar.

Vakorina, Mastykina, Kuzmin and Kutsepalova were used to inserting the well-known Latin saying in their speech which made them exceedinly prenentious and ridiculous, to my thinking. I really despised this pretentious manner of speech because, in reality, I had never attempted to elevate myself, for there's nothing more insane and ridiculous than doing so. My Latinity was much better than that of Makarova, my Latin teacher. Makarova wasn't a saucy spinster, but her methods of teaching were very archaic.

My condition was rather burdensome at Smolensk State University. I suffered from sleepless nights quite often, so my health was greatly damaged at university. My former groupmates were extremely cunning and tricky. Their health wasn't as poor as that of mine, so their life wasn't so unbearable. The thing is that my ability not to sleep in the course was much weaker than that of my former groupmates.

My behaviour in my early university years was rather artificial because I preferred using "you" stead of "thou" while talking to my groupmates. In 2019, Vladislav Alekseevich Prokhorenkov became an exception. I was his friend till March, 2020. 2020 was a borderline in our lives, because we were deprived of an access to Tvardovsky library. I remember that Prokhorenkov told me how paying duty visits to the afore-mentioned library motivates him to study. When the quarantine began, his schedule became extremely disorganised.

Vlad's views on teaching foreign languages, his sympathies to teaching Latin at university were very regressive and partially reactionary. Vlad was quite incompetent in terms of estimating my French and English pronunciation, though he admitted that I'm much more skilled than the most of my groupmates. In 2020 he took the side of obscurantists during my conflict with my former university.

In May, 2018, I got hurt in a car accident. I get out from a tram, so I was thrown away from the cross-walk by a flabby driver under forty. He was a big shot in the military department but he defended himself behind his wife. He told road policemen that it was his pregnant wife who hurt me. Police officers initially suspected him because the blackguard got too nervous. His ugly blowsy face, his hysterically disproportioned mien betrayed him, for his face reddened. Had I been older, I would have altercated with him. But, eventually police officers happened to take a bribe, so the swine wasn't tried.

In 2018 I created my main account in otvet.mail.ru.

In 2019, Ksenya Alekseevna Pavinskaya asked me how to master English. She pointed out that I was quite speedy in speaking English. I gave her very stupid and useless pieces of advices, so she didn't follow them. In the same year, I read the recollections written by Georgy Georgievich Silnitsky, the professor who taught at Smolensk State University. Silnitsky was a white immigrant. He wrote that his father was arrested in the fifties or in the end of forties, so his political and philosophical views were pretty antisoviet and anticommunistic. In 2021, I attempted to delete the Wikipedian article about his shameful biography, but Wikipedians, defending reactionary obscurantism, rejected my suggestion.

In the same year, I've been becoming more and more disappointed in my university teachers, so I wrote a series of letters to Anna Vladislavovna Korolkova, the best student of faculty. I wrote then in an unpedantic strain, but her reply was overly pretentious. With Korolokova, I have been warring for a very long time. This kind of war is a partizan one, and I simply must that she doesn't notice my existence at all. My acquitances pointed out that she's very arrogant, scornful and dim-witted, because she really thinks that she's an all-rounder. Between 2018 and 2019, I remember how she told Sviridoca, her university friend, that she has no long-term memory at all.

In the spring of the same year, I learnt Latin very intensively, though my try to learn Latin was pretty unsuccessful. The point is that my university life was stuffed with useless subjects The worst thing is that they were so numerous that I almost always got rattled. In April, I decided to begin read Lenin's State and Revolution, so this small booklet was completely read in the end of the same year.

In the very beginning of 2020, I was used to buying very old English grammars (Kachalova, Novitskaya) and giving them to my groupmates and coursemates. I printed quite a lot in 2019, so I gave some of my printed novels to Svetlana Yurievna Galchenkova, my groupmate. All these grammars describe classical English grammar, so the order of rules is quite obsolete. The grammars describe very artificial and rare types of Complex Object, to say nothing of totally useless tenses, like Future Perfect Continuous. In the same year, I wrote a booklet about Belayeva's, Kachalova's and Novitskaya's grammars but I burnt the written pages because there was a coup d'etat in my viewpoint, in general. From April, 2020, I stopped praising and recommending all the classical grammars. In 2020, I condemned using classical novels in teaching English, focusing on the minute things in English grammar, ignoring the importance of accent reduction in professional education. My break with all the reactionary obscurantists of my former university led to the war with them.

In September, 2020, my father and I talked to Lyudmila Yurievna Mastykina, Olga Ivanovna Osavoluk, the deputy of dean, Valentina Sergeevna Kovaleva. The conversation was full of attacks on my personality, so it was insanely hard to behave myself. Osavoluk didn't acknowledged that all the students of faculty had been suffering from the immense size of hometask. However, Mastykina babbled out in the conversation that she wasn't used to correcting the copybooks. She said that she was unable to detect American traits in my former English pronunciation, although my accent in this period was rather r-cloured.

In 2020, I stopped studying at Smolensk State University because of the conflict between the big shots and know-alls of my former faculty, including the deputy of dean, Vakorina, Mastykina. In other words, I was forced to take academic leave which was prolonged in 2021. The point is that the system of online-education in Smolensk State University had been malfunctioning, so I was quite unable to study in the course of quarantine. In 2022, I was allowed to resume studying at university, though my health was the main obstacle.

In 2020, I organised an individual petty bourgeois revolt against Lyudmila Yuryevna Mastykina, my former university teacher. The thing is that she was used to terrorising all the students of my first group, including myself, with totally useless home reading, so in 2020 I stopped obeying her in the course of her class. Arina Starovoytova, my groupmate, quarrelled with me because of my uprising. Galchenkova tried to make Starovoytova compose herself, but it was evident that Galchenkova herself tried to hide away her real emotions. I'm not trying to say that Galchenkova is totally double-faced, but she became one of Mastykina's favourite students in 2020. She criticised Anna Korolkova very often, though.

Almost all my university teachers were quite illiterate, dopey, dotty and ignorant. There were exceptions, though. As for English professors, all of them were absolutely incompetent in terms of English phonology. Their accents were partially rhotic and partially non non-rhotic. Their illiteracy was so great that Mastykina, the head of English chair, was totally unable to differ rhotic General American from non-rhotic British English. All the English teachers have been using Arakin's textbook, so they're just drags on their students.

In the autumn of 2020, I went through the pedagogical practicum at the fourth gymnasium. This experience was awful, owing to the illiteracy of English teachers from this school.

My groupmates

 → Участник:Роман Сергеевич Сидоров/My former groupmates

Unfortunately, the most of Russian intellectuals are extremely reactionary, though some of them realise that the present social order is the great impediment in terms of self-education and self-development. I wrote a great deal of letters to my university acquaintances. Leonid Alekseevich Kuzmin was accustomed to receiving and reading them. I gave Kuzmin a lot of my printed books, so Leonid Alekseevich read them, recollecting the classes and myself.

One of my acquaintances at Smolensk State University was Ilya Igorevich Parsegov, a very uncultured guy from Vyasma. I wouldn't sat that this guy's influence was predominantly positive. the thing is that Parsegov was always tricky, so he wasn't the greatest enemy of university institutions, degrees, customs and orders.

In 2022, my groupmate was Vasilisa Sergeyevna Skovorodina, a very tricky and cunning girl. On the first of September, she said that the students of Power Engineering Institutes are very uncultured riffraffs, so I found Vasilisa to have been very haughty and cocksure. From time to time, she helped me. In addition to her help, Vasilisa kept some of my secrets, which aren't secrets at all right now (my chronical diseases). I also helped her with performing labour functions.

The most of my groupmates weren't class-conscious, even though I witnessed a revolt, a "strike action" against Irina Vladimirovna Vakorina. The thing is that Vakorina was the teacher of my groupmates in 2019. In the beginning of October, in 2019, my groupmates expelled Vakorina from the classroom because Elizaveta Gennadyevna Fyodorova, my former groupmate, interrupted Vakorina, so there was a conflict between interrupting Fyodorova, Galchenkova and a set of members of my first group.

2020

 → Участник:Роман Сергеевич Сидоров/2020

I'd say that this year was just cursed, accursed, so to say. From April to November, I was overly critical about Shilov, a Russian portrait painter.

In 2020, I created three accounts in otvet.mail.ru, a Russia Quora. After I'd created the first one, I began criticising formalism and scholastics of Russian provincial linguistic education. I was very critical about teaching Latin, reading very old novels in English classes. My critique was witty in a way, but I vulgarised and oversimplified the real catastrophe in Russian education. All in all, all my questions lacked facts, their detailed description and conclusions, so I quarreled a lot with the users of otvet.mail.ru.

I began studying materialism in 2020, so I was accustomed to discussing various philosophical problems in otvet.mail.ru. I encountered the user Colonel Jason in August. Wee quarreled quite often. I must admit that I was defeated with his incredible haughtiness. This illiterate blackguard despised working masses, showed his contempt quite often, so I was greatly offended with his haughtiness. The thing is that this person think himself as a valiant knight. I trolled this ignorant philosopher, using an account with Susanna Reid's face, so one of my former comrades found the story with a female account very shameful. I didn't trolled this philosopher too much, for my main victim was Vasily Shamashov. Using the account with Reid's face, I discovered that Shamashov's ignorance in terms of grammar is just insanely great.

In August 2020, I absorbed Lenin's "Materialism and Empirio-criticism" with great avidity. I was so impressed with this book that I began asking questions, discussing materialism. Some of my questionions showed my lack of knowledge of Lenin's works. This month was vitally, crucially important for my further life bc I stopped learning the Latin language, once and for all.

It would appear that I was extremely inclined to dualism or even idealistic and formalistic theories of German reactionary romantics, like Schlegel. I was accustomed to writing quite a lot about the absolute and the indefinite, though these terms are very amaterialistic and useless. There were loads of very illogical and reactionary thoughts about philosophy. Fortunately, I burnt a great deal of drafts of letters to my friends and colleagues, so it's very uneasy to describe this period of my life, using very insightful primary sources. In this period of my life, practice was blind, and theory was dead.

Hegel was chiefly unintelligible for me. I asked a great deal of questions, discussed hegelism and materialism with my comrades quite a lot, but Hegel was an enigma for me. I'd dreamed about studying Hegel for a very long time, but I abandoned this idea in 2021. To be frank, I even reduced studying dialectical materialism to studying Hegel's logic. In 2020 and 2021, I was very eager to read very reactionary philosophers. I didn't read them, though. In April 2022, I was very critical about an American marxist, replacing studying dialectical materialism with studying hegelianism.

It would appear that 2020 was one of the worst years in my life, because I suffered from very great intellectual problems. For instance, I thought that art is the most unpleasant, useless and insignificant type of human cognition. It's possible to say that my views on art were quite reactionary and formalistic, for I read Kant, watched videos with Ivan Boldyrev, a very unpleasant philosophical mite. I picked up a set of his fancy and reactionary terms. I planned to commit suicide, to tell the truth. The main cause of my suicidal thoughts was the campaign of my university officials against me, my linguistic agnosticism, its reincarnation. The thing is that I really thought that it's quite impossible to master English pronunciation because the perception of sounds seemed to me entirely and wholly subjective.

In 2019 and in the first part of 2020, I was very dogmatical while dealing with English grammar. The thing is that I learnt Latin quite a lot, learning various dictionaries by heart, so the traces of dogmatical latinism were very significant in my viewpoint. The tone of my message in the Russian Quora show that I was very arrogant and uncultivated. In the expiration of 2020, I suffered from the greatest mental pains in my life. All my mental pains were caused by my loneliness, by my isolation from society. The thing is that it's not me who made me quite lonely but the present reactionary social order which devoured human souls.

In 2020, there was my first clash with Valentin Melnikov, a Russian esperantist. My critique of Melnikov was poor and weak because of my very aggressive wording.

2021

 → Участник:Роман Сергеевич Сидоров/2021

2021 was the least productive year in my life, even though this year was a key one for the development of my present viewpoint. Its end was magnificent and unhappy. I encountered a very complicated problem, concerning accent reduction. It would appear that the origins of the metaphysical problem are connected with the lack of more or less scientific education. The question was not whether it's possible to get rid of an accent but whether we can know all about an accent. The problem is based upon the present labour division, for it's obvious that even the meanest professor of phonetics is able to perceive sounds better than the best worker.

I didn't get rid of my linguistic agnosticism, despite my video calls with Cameron, an ignorant blackguard from Australia. I got acquainted with him in July. In 2022, I banned him because of his offensive behavior. He was almost completely ignorant and uneducated, so, in brief, I encountered a very swinish, lazy lad who confessed that he was totally unable to accomplish his secondary education, owing to his exceeding idleness. His speech was exceptionally stultifying. So far as he was mainly illiterate in the province of his mother, he couldn't level up my English at all.

In 2021, I created a new account in otvet.mail.ru in order to disseminate information about labour struggle in Russia. Sometimes my questions were very stupid, just because this period of life was very complicated.

So far as Olga Ivanovna Osavoluk ordered me to prolong my academic leave, I did so, although the process of prolongation was extremely long, owing to the bureaucracy in my health care centre.

In 2022, I created an account in Reddit, the site for stupid trolls. In my Western acquaintance's opinion, Reddit is rather addictive, but I wouldn't say so. I asked a set of questions, concerning Scandinavian girls, but idiotic trolls spoilt my karma. Unfortunately, all my questions were deleted, so it's hard to give the full set of sources, concerning my battle with trolls. Its users aren't very brainy because their answers are quite illetarate, because Pavel Anatolyevich Skrelin proved that the complete accent reduction is possible.

2022

 → Участник:Роман Сергеевич Сидоров/2022

On the 1st of September, I resumed studying at Smolensk State University. On this day, I clearly apprehend that Vakorina still remembered me because my conflict with the whole faculty was extremely memorable. From my then view, I chosed to become the shiest person in the faculty. Wholly and solely from the present bird's-eye view, I realize that this sort of tactics was completely wrong. Step by step, I had been realizing that the flattery of servility along with execrable manners might have conquered the hearts of Vakorina, Silayev, and Belyutina, for, from their view, Alina Ruslanovna Chulova's public and scholar virtues almost passed comprehension.

I got sick on the first of September because of Vakorina's nonchalance. The point is that the classroom was so stuffed with the students that Vakorina decided to open the window leaf. Much later, Vakorina's nonchalance and blackguardism prevented her from clearly apprehending that my health had been exctremely fragile. Partially, I had got a nervous breakdown on the 4th of September, for I anticipated my punishment because my brained resisted home reading because I suffered a lot from such an atrocity because home reading was a part and parcel of philological education at Smolensk State University. However, Mastykina, Vakorina, and Sapozhnikova with her shameful lectures weren't good at literature at all.

My attempts to be silent and sectretive were completely abortive, so on my birthday Vakorina decided to interrogate me, She forced me to tell her about my most traumatizing experience, so I repled to her in vague terms. My answer to her was criticized by Sofia Fabrikova, a wicked, illiterate girl.

The above-mentioned speech was delivered on the 5th of October, I digressed a lot because Vakorina wanted me to tell the touching, tearsome story about my family relationships, Several exalted girls had already told their stories, so they cried a lot, dropping tears during Vakorina's class. In my speech, I complained a lot, describing my daily life, using the words from domestic science. Then I said the decadent, insanely pessimistic things, like 'The first mistake I ever made was being born at all', 'There's no borderline between Death and Life' and all the most reactionary, gloomy, sulky outcasts from the bin-liner, garbage can of history. Vakorina was really shocked with my words, for I mirrored her own ideas.

It was obvious that I had been trying to find a reconciliation with my former university community, although I didn't abandon criticizing Ivanova, my then French teacher and the most of my teachers.

My groupmates hated, badgered me because of my poor health, suffocating cough, so on the 6th of October, I wrote a letter of resignation. Officially, I was expelled on the 10th of October, but nobody told me that I had been already expelled, owing to the afore-mentioned letter, when I decided to write an application for enrolling in university again. On the 1st of November, Osavoluk, the deputy of dean, told me that it was impossible to restore me at Smolensk State University. The dean proved to be an abject liar, an callous swine who didn't inform me about this accident at all. She definitely knew about this letter of resignation, but before Ustimenko, her boss whose manners apalled me, she swore that she had never heard about this letter of resignation.

Prior to this course of events, on the 19th of October, Vakorina expelled me from her class because of my cough. She order me to visit the canteen to drink a cuppa. I decided to go to the university ambulance station, so I visited the university nurse, for I didn't have got even the smallest sum of money. Then I decided to return to the classroom, In the staircase, I encountered Vasilisa Sergeyevna Skovoridina, my groupmate. Vasilisa told me that I should return to the classroom as soon as possible, for Vakorina is going to write a report, concerning my absence. Kuzmenkova's incompetence (she was my GP doctor) also led to the conflict with Vakorina, Ivanova and etc. The main issue is that she deprived me of sick leave several times, so I had got to attend classes with my cough.

On the 1st of November, I attended the lecture delivered by Tumshais, the class with Ivanova, and only then I was informed that I had been expelled from university, owing to my letter of resignation. I verily believed that my exulsion from university was illegal, so, with unceasing sincerity, I hoped that Artemenkov would helped me. On the 10th of November, On the 10th of November, I paid a duty visit to Mikhail During the appointment, I explained that Olga Ivanovna Osavoluk forced me to write a letter of resignation, although it was Vakorina who forced me to do so, although Osavoluk's pressure was also very significant. Artemenkov happened to be a masculine woman, defending a demoralizing and demoralized coterie called 'Philological faculty'.

In November, the dean and her deputy (V. S. Kovaleva and O. I. Osavoluk) didn't allow me to take out his secondary school diploma because, in their opinion, initially, I should have filled the Exit Report. The dean declared that she banned taking out my secondary school diploma because she suspected that he was trying to escape paying the tuition fee. Then I conversed with Tishina, Kovaleva's boss. Tishina told Kovaleva that I had got a right to take out my secondary school diploma without filling the Exit Report. Osavoluk began altercating with me, reproaching me.

In the same month, Osavoluk violated my right to all my credit points, for, initially, in the academic reference my credit points were greatly reduced but I struggled with Osavoluk and the dean, so, eventually, all the credit points were written in my academic reference. Initially I sincerely hoped that Artemenkov would help me with the above accident.

At the expiration of 2022, I attempted to enroll in Synergy University, although I failed to do so, for this university is obviously the fake one, so its official representatives were scammers. The reason why I attempted to enroll in these infernal regions was my traumatizing experience. In the next year, I conversed with the official representatives of Moscow International University quite a lot. I was exceptionally picky, meticulous. I read lots of documents, concerning the quality of online education. All the vicussitudes of my life, its infernal regions were instructive. I hope, therefore, that I've become much more conscious.

In 2022, I created an account in Reddit, the site for stupid trolls. In my Western acquaintance's opinion, Reddit is thought to be rather addictive, but I wouldn't say so. I asked a set of questions, concerning Scandinavian girls, but idiotic trolls spoilt my karma. Unfortunately, all my questions were deleted, so it's hard to give the full set of sources, concerning my battle with trolls. Its users aren't very brainy because their answers are quite illiterate, because Pavel Anatolievich Skrelin proved that the complete accent reduction is possible.

2023

 → Участник:Роман Сергеевич Сидоров/2023

In 2023, I attempted to criticise Valentin Viktorovich Melnikov. I stopped talking to him, because Valentin Viktorovich is accustomed to offending his opponents. In my life, I offended quite often, but I really regret that I should have used a great deal of swearings while arguing. Melnikov is just a troll, so, in my opinion, there's no use in talking to him because of his shocking ignorance in terms of linguistics and learning foreign languages. Much earlier, I blamed him in chauvinism.

In April, I had got to enroll Smolensk State University once again. Enrolling in this nest of reaction again was an indispensable part of changing my university. With such a trick, I deceived all my university teachers and groups for they really expected that I would resume studying with them because the faculty officials didn't ordered to unite three groups into two groups.

In May of the same year, I enrolled in Moscow International University. As my former university, I started writing invectives about its rector and its teachers. The International university in Moscow happened to be much better than my former alma mater in all the aspects, just because there're no oppressive teachers at this university. My marks happened to be much better at this university. I'm quite unable to call Moscow International University 'ideal' but my conditions of studying have been greatly improved. Of course, my fellow students have nothing in common, because they're mainly dispersed, but I wouldn't say that there're abject liars, know-alls, like Danilova, Tsatneva, Chulova.

In this year, I was very addicted to reading quite a lot, so I found reading a lot a very harmful habit, so I'd been trying to battle past, get rid of this habit for very many months. Reading was a laudanum for me because the problems with my spinal cord cause very weird hues and cries about non-rhoticity because I managed to find r-coloured vowels in absolutely non-rhotic accents. By the expiration of twenty twenty three, my approach to learning English became much more systematic, and it must be confessed that I throw away all my collywobbles, concerning rhoticity.

2024

As far back as 2018, I became a reader of Tvardovky library. Initially, I was very surprised that there should be lots of unique and rare books in that crummy library. Step by step, I had been becoming more and more disappointed with the flattery of servilism of Alla Alekseyvna Chaykovskaya, poor mental faculties of Rimma Leonidovna Tarasevich before Viktoria Petrovna Mikhalyova proved to be an uncouth swine. The thing is that in 2024, Viktoria Petrovna Mikhalyova didn't gave me access to Rapanovich's French phonetics and Angelevich's French 'Manuel' (I needed all these books because my French had become extremely rusty by that time), although I had got a right to borrow this book in the foreign circulation library. In 2024, Mikhalyova argued a lot with me because of my provocations to misconduct. To reconcile with her, I decided to write my apologies to her. Despite her extremely reactionary and regressive views on linguistics, learning languages, her chauvinist distaste to the English languages, Mikhalyova happened to be rather a valuable witness because she testified against Smolensk State University. At the same time, Mikhalyova showed her exceeding incompetence in the province of phonetics. She also pointed out that Smolensk State University French teachers, including Zaitseva, were pretty ignorant in this branch of learning during Mikhalyova's university years.

It must be confessed that the testimonies of Mikhalyova against her university teachers were quite precious, because her ignorance in the hemisphere of French phonology and syntax manifested themselves as brilliantly as possible.

In May and June, I met with Leonid Alekseyevich Kuzmin, my former university teacher. I asked him lots of question about his colleagues. Initially, he couldn't fathom my real intentions, so he was affable and friendly. Step by step, he had been realising that I just interrogated him, so he threatened me in a mild way. Kuzmin made a very serious chronological mistake because he said that Moodle didn't malfunction during my student years.

On the sixth of July, I went to my former university dean to get a reference proving that I had gone through a pedagogical practicum in 2020. While entering my former university hall, I noticed that the conduct of safety guards was very aggressive. The ancillary aim was to record Kovaleva's words, concerning the distance learning of 2020. The dean admitted that Moodle malfunctioned in 2020, so the students had got to study at the nighttime. In other words, Kuzmin's chronological mistake was corrected. I didn't notice any significant changes at Smolensk State University. While there, I took lots of photos, videos, and audio recordings, compromising the university. After a few hours spent there, I was expelled from the building.

Wikipedia

 → Участник:Роман Сергеевич Сидоров/Wikipedia

I created my first account in Wikipedia in 2017. The atmosphere in Wikipedia was much better in 2017. I talked to very polite and cultivated persons. The first account was deleted in 2018. The second profile was created in 2020, so I'd been writing Wikipedian articles for two years.

In Latin Wikipedia, I created nine articles, even though my Latin wasn't advanced. For instance, there're loads of grammatical mistakes in the article about John Churchill. Some of senior users were impressed with my Latinity and audacity. The article about Henry Dundas was uncommonly poor, according to the opinion of American professor, though. All the articles in Latin Wikipedia were extremely short and incomplete for an appalling lack of sources.

I left Wikipedia in 2023 because of its highly conservative policies. The point is that miserable public servants of Wikipedia were very irritated with my 'aggressive ultra-left ideas' expressed in the article about Columbia University strike, occurred between 2021 and 2022.

I began writing the articles about Western revolutionary labour movement in 2022. I'd say that my first articles were written completely illiterately, so I've been suffering from my stylistical, tactical mistakes made in the last year. I wouldn't say that all my articles are totally useless, but all of them are quite incomplete, even though I created an account in archive.org. Creating an account in this site is very complicated and tiresome, by the way.

I wouldn't say that my behaviour in Wikipedia was ideal. However, I think that my editing Wikipedia, creating various articles was quite precious, even though my articles in Wikipedia are very imperfect in terms of grammar. I wrote about labour strikes, revolts, secondary Victorian novelists, unknown scholars quite a lot. I was used to violating the main rules of Wikipedia while writing the articles. At the very beginning, my violating the rules wasn't noticeable. I violated the rules quite often, because it was totally unnoticeable in the first months, and, accordingly, I thought that I wouldn't be banned.

As for English Wikipedia, I wrote a set of articles about very insignificant persons, locations. I was used to editing my personal page in Wikipedia quite often, so a tetchy Wikipedia warned me. If I hadn't deleted a lot of biographical information in my user page, this user would have deleted my user page in enwiki In his estimation, I violated the rules of enwiki with describing my biography, interests and tastes. it's noticeable that Nick Moyers is just an average American layman, just because, for instance, I can argue that I'm not interested in his very reactionary political views, so he should deleted all the pieces of information about his reactionary views.

In English Wikipedia, I was able to communicate with phonetician Peter Roach, though this scientist said that Wikipedia isn't a good place for asking questions.

I created several articles in English Wikipedia. The most of my Wikipedian articles were written about the native village of my ancestors, its surroundings. In 2022, I decided to write about my former rector but I really regret that I should have written a positive stub about this bribe taker. There was an attempt to delete the article about this bureaucrat, but I defended my article with great zeal In 2023, I tried to improve the article with blackening Artemenkov quite a lot, so the current version of this article is much better than the previous ones, because I mentioned an arbitrary firing, a scandal with foreign students, learning Russian and being unable to speak Russian at all. I also criticized Artemenkov's ties with reactionary priests in this article.

The hatred between me and the reactionary part of Wikipedians was expressed in my user page. There was a clarion call in my user page which was deleted by reactionary beaurocrats among Wikipedians. The clarion call was a call for the class struggle in Russian Wikipedia.

I've been calling for the most consistent class struggle against the reactionary obscurantist forces of Wikipedia led by Mark Bernstein, the clingiest and pickiest liberal of Wikipedia, I was justified, because reactionary forces forgot about my existence, so I'm still free in ruwiki.

My temper

 → Участник:Роман Сергеевич Сидоров/My temper

Some of bourgeois intellectuals, the likes of Vakorina and Kovaleva, my former dean, consider me to be very impulsive. They're partially right, for sometimes I'm quite unable to control my emotions. Not that I'm indecisive, - no! But, you know, I'm used to being slow and meticulous while dealing with very complicated arguments, ideas, theories. Kutuzova called me an idealist, even though I've been trying the most consistent atheist and materialist since 2019, although my drift towards atheism was very long, because earlier I was a deist.

Between 2020 and 2022, it's possible to call my behaviour very snobbish, partially foolish. I was used to fighting with trolls, defeating them, offending and even insulting them. I really reget that my tastes, real intentions should have been partially reactionary. However, it's possible to argue that there've been positive changes in my temper. For instance, in my schooldays, I was rather haughty and conceited, but since 2017, I've been becoming less and less arrogant.

I'm a very lonely person, because it's very hard to talk to my peers in person. The point is that reactionary forces have been isolating me from the layers of petty bourgeois and proletarian intelligentzia. There're lots of people, calling me an autist. The majority of such very half-witted people use Tandem, in comformity with my experience

I wouldn't sat that I'm more or less kind and polite. I've been trying to work on my temper and manners, though. The thing is that the hypocrisy of my university education, the laurels of a brilliant intellectual spoilt me. Parsegov, Pinchukov, my university comrades, were used to calling me "a Latin god", "a philological deity", so these laurels made me a know-all, so I was used to giving advices to Parsegov, Pichukov quite often, because they thought I'm a brilliant intellectual.

My little library

In my early university days, I was used to printing the books a lot. The first ones were terrif, in my humble opinion. I'd been printing quite often and quite a lot before my mother allow me to buy a great deal of novels in English. I decided to buy the, because my skills in terms of printing and making bindings were totally amateurish, so I ceased to print very voluminous books, like Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, Hegel's Science of Logic, a set of books on Kant and Hegel written by reactionary and rotten philosophers.

In 2017, I was obsessed with Dostoevsky, but nowadays I wonder why Dobrolyubov and Belinsky praised him so much, so I've got a personal distaste to Dostoevsky, mainly because he's become quite fashionable, along with Bulgakov.

In 2018, 2022, I attempted to read Tobias Smollett, a Scottish writer. I wasn't really disappointed with the Adventures of an Atom, even though there're loads of stupid mos in this novel. I wasn't disappointed with Smollett because there're loads of realistic elements in his novels, including completely unreadable Lancelot Greaves. I didn't manage to read the whole novel, because I lost my book at Smolensk State University.

In 2022, I created an account in archive.org, and I've been saving a great deal of books in my favourites, a category in my account. Among my favourites, there're loads of books on economical history of the West, a set of novels, biographies of actors. Among my favourites, there's "Philadelphia Story" written by Philip Barry. The question is not whether I like "Philadelphia Story" but whether I really find this plot very good or not. As is known, my comment on this play was totally positive, even though I don't find the film extremely funny, especially in comparison with "Bringing up Baby".

As for my favourite books, I'm an amateur of Shakespeare, Guy de Maupassant, Gorky, Bernard Shaw, Lomonosov, Kuprin, Pomyalovsky, Gertsen, Georges Sand, Sholokhov, Sofya Kovalevskaya, Voynich, Gaskell, Alexei Tolstoy, Alexei Ostrovsky, Fitzgerald, Jack London, Plutarch, Chernyshevsky, Zola, to say nothing of Korolenko, Turgenev and Leo Tolstoy. In 2022, I read Veresaev, and found him very boring to read, but his work on Dostoevsky is quite impressive and unique. In 2019, I read Raffaello Giovagnoli's Spartacus. This novel really inspired me to learn Latin quite a lot. Sinclair Lewis is more or less readable, in my opinion, but I'm not gonna read again his 'Main Street'. My opinion on Anatoliy Vonogradov is neutral and moderate, though his style is quite imperfect, in my opinion, so sometimes I'm totally unable to understand very big passages from his novels.

I was pretty dissatisfied with Oscar Wilde's only novel. I didn't get why this novel was issued in the Soviet Union several times.

I was a good student before the winter exams of 2019 when the repressive measures of Mastykina manifested themselves. Before 2019, I suffered a lot from insomnia, but my marks were more or less normal. However, the feud between me and Mastykina, the head of English chair, wasn't very noticeable in 2019, though.

In 2019, I read Bryusov's novel on antiquity, Reading was very unpleasant because the author is just obsessed with useless details and stuff, so I was very disappointed wuth his Altar of Victory. In my opinion, this novel is the worst literary production in the world. A bit later, I tried to read Aldanov's novel on the first French revolution, but I stopped reading because of Aldanov's stupidity and dopiness, so I'm used to calling Aldanov 'Doldonov'.

In 2022, I stopped printing booklets and books, because my bachelor flat is just stuffed with various editions, including self-made or homemade ones. I've been planning to print books by Aveling to translate them into Russian.

George Sand

In 2024, I got obsessed with the novels of George Sand. So far as I'm very exalted by nature, it was a great pleasure to read 'Consuelo', to say nothing of its sequel. Although Consuelo is a fiction character, George Sand portrayed her so realistically and vividly that I was able to imagine all the details of opera house scenery. Evidently, Sand supports the views of Consuelo on the art in the argument between Porpora and Consuelo. I'm on the side of Porpora, because I went through very many hardships which made me inexorably bilious and inclined to vendetta. I was positively impressed with Le Compagnon de Tour de France, although I criticized the weaker sides of Pierre Huguenin. In my estimation, in the second half of this novel, the authoress repeated hysteria of Indiana and Brown. However, Georges Sand is also very observing in 'Indiana', despite its very serious weak points which go beyond measure. As for 'Horace', I just adore the deep-rotted, scathing and merciless realism of author in the personal history of Marthe and Paul Arsène. As an entertainment, I highly estimated 'The Gallant Lords of Bois-Doré', although the final chapters were written very poorly.

I criticized the reactionary political and philosophical views of George Sand, because they really diminished the value of her literary productions, like the 'Son of Monsieur Antoine', because the recociliation between Capital and Labour is obviously quite impossible. In her 'The Devil's Pool', she is also in between, so this literary production partially glorifies kulak counterrevolution. It also must be confessed that her purely amaterialistic views weakened the significance of her novels, because her shameful crusade against French Enlightenment also debilitated the artistic value of the dilogy about Consuelo. Reactionary petty bourgeois views of George Sand also manifested themselves in her Marquis de Villemer which has got quite a weak system of characters.

History

In 2020, I read Evgeny Viktorovich Tarle's monograph about Napoleon. I was so obsessed with this book that I really wanted to change my phone settings, in order to use the French revolutionary calender. My opinion on Napoleon is very negative, though. In the next year, I read the biography of Karl Marx written by Franz Mhering who was highly estimated by Vladimir Ilyich Lenin. This book was boring in a way, but there was a good portrayal of alive Karl Marx in this book. I also enjoyed reading Loginov's works about Lenin in the same year. At the first glance, it was evident to me, that Loginov's work are fundamentally important, owing to the great amount of sources from archives.

My accounts

 → Участник:Роман Сергеевич Сидоров/Аккаунты

I've been creating accounts quite a lot, so I'm very active on the Internet. There're all my contacts in the below list. The links to my accounts are in references, so if you want to find my account in a social media, just click a reference affixed in the end of sentence.

1. My account in Telegram is the most important account among all my profiles. I'm used to using Telegram very often, so the easiest way to text me is through Telegram. In my estimation, the interface of this app is the best one, so using Telegram is much more pleasant than using VK.
2. My account in VK is less alive, but I'm used to visiting my account once or twice a week, so texting me through VK is also possible.
3. Texting me through Youtube is also less possible, because I've been using my account in Youtube for commenting Alexei Ababilov's videos.
4. I abandoned using Viber and Whatsapp, for I was very dissatisfied with their very inconvenient interfaces, so it's very hard to talk to me, using these apps.
5. It's possible to talk to me in Pinterest, for the interface of this social media isn't completely unbearable.
6. I'm a fan of Tandem. I've been using this app since 2021, so I find this application very good, but Telegram is still better.
7. My opinion on Facebook and Instagram is much worse than that of my countrymen, so I don't use these sites very often.
8. It's always possible to text me in Skype, because I just adore this application.
9. I'm not a fan of TikTok, but it's always possible to talk to me, using this application.

My linguistic views

My general views

 → Участник:Роман Сергеевич Сидоров/Phonology

I've been very critical about the modern philological education since 2020. In the very beginning, my criticism was very vulgar and partially metaphysical. I was accustomed to expressing my very illogical, irrational, and metaphysical linguistic views in the site for English learners.

I'm interested in stylistics, quite a Soviet science, phonetics, teaching English. In my opinion, modern English teachers shouldn't use classical novels. Their usage in the English classes must be legally banned because of its immense damage. It's obvious that it's important to teach everyday lexical entries, concerning plumbing, cooking, repairing various TV-sets.

I really appreciate Igor Evgenyevich Anichkov's writings on linguistics, even though his political, philosophical and religious views are quite harmful, extremely reactionary and obscurantistic. In my opinion, his reactionary views on religion, state, family were a drag on his intellectual development, including his achievements in linguistics. His classification of linguistic sciences is quite reasonable, but his classification of sciences in general is rather trite, idealistic and useless. Among other prominent linguists, I'm always pointing to professor Geoff Lindsey whose views on the current English transcription is purely reasonable.

I'm against teaching Latin, Greek and very rare languages at secondary schools. I've been criticizing DeepL and Google quite often, but I hope that my critique is always more or less productive. I'm used to being very critical about teaching Latin and Greek at teacher training departments.

In my opinion, professor Roach gave an incorrect definition to the fortis and lenis sounds, for he described them as 'a cover term'. May be, I'm not right. Nevertheless, it seems to be that O'Connor's definition is the most correct one, but this passage is a mere opinion, so I'm quite unable to give a definition. In general, O'Connor's textbook on English phonology seems to be much more superior to Ann Baker's series of textbooks, not to mention 'Get Rid of Your Accent' and 'English Pronunciation in Use'. The main target of my critique is 'Pronunciation with Emma', owing to the great amount of her subscribers. I'm critical about her videos because her approach to teaching phonetics is overly simplified, and her own accent is likely to be extremely artificial.

As for French learning materials, I just adore Popova's textbook, although this book is very old-timey and ancient. Rapanovich's description of French phonology is so stuffed with theory that it's quite impossible to drill French sounds at all. My opinion on Slobodtchikova's Soviet textbooks is also mainly positive, although this series of textbooks has got lots of imperfections. The worst sort of materials was represented in Youtube. For instance Hugo Cotton, an uncouth provincial, a swinish owner of InnerFrench, rather a popular channel. is the worst-conducted blackguard, stuffing the Internet with his appalling French. It's obvious that Cotton's educational level is extremely low.

Mastykina, Vakorina, Silayev

I don't like the level of teaching English at Smolensk State University, Moscow State Linguistical University, because the methods of teaching are quite dated in these institution of higher education, according to all the known sources. I don't really understand why very illiterate persons, the likes of Mastykina, Sapozhnikova, Silayev, Kutsepalova, Ivanova, my former French teacher, are used to punishing students with home reading and individual reading. It's noticeable that they're not well-red because ignoring Veresaev's work on Dostoevsky and Tolstoy denotes that they're insanely illiterate. I also noticed that Ivanova had been imitating teaching. In my opinion, CEFR levels are quite superficial.

I consider Silayev's views on English phonology to be amateurish, for this university teacher doesn't specialize in phonology.

Smolensk State University

In 2023, I started the campaign against Smolensk State University on the Internet. I wrote a series of references with the scathing, boisterous critique of the corrupted English chair in Smolensk State University. The references written in 2023 were chiefly about the dean and her deputy, the boorish, caddish and cocky behaviour of Mastykina, Vakorina, the cruelty, formalism and hypocrisy of Silaev, not to mention Korolkova's shameful folleries. In my references, I didn't describe and discuss the poor accents of the most of university teachers, though. In general, my pedagogical views are quite close to those of Anton Semyonovich Makarenko, so the philological education at Smolensk State University is idealistic, metaphysical and obscurantistic, for the students of foreign faculty don't know the words 'means of production', 'section', 'numerically controlled machines', for, in accordance with the marxist conception of language, the human language couldn't have appeared without labour. I'm always trying to give the links to the primary source in my reviews, describing and discussing my former university, so some of my reviews are definitely innovative.

In 2024, and 2025. the sycophants and blimps from Smolensk State University attempted to remove my critique of their concentration camp, but their attempts were abortive, because they're so dim-witted that they didn't register accounts in Wikipedia. In the comments to their edits, these blackguards pointed out that this article 'discredits the university's reputation', so, in their opinion, they prevented 'an attempt to make a subversion'. One of them was even blocked. On the one hand, Wikipedia defended my subversive edits. Nevertheless, Lumaca, one of Wikipedian big shots, censored my article, so all the pieces of information, concerning the crimes committed by my former university teachers and officials were edited out. In the corresponding article in English Wikipedia, my ideological subversion proved to be much more succesful, because the pageviews aren't that numerous. There were abortive attempts of Enwiki's censors to edit out all my subversive edits, but my correct tactics prevented the further attempts to suppress the freedom of speech. My present-day tactics is confined to defending all my achievements in Russian Wikipedia, for it's simply impossible to write a serious of articles about Vakorina, Kovaleva and their accessories.

I've been archiving all the compromising materials about my former university since 2023 on the Internet Archieve, although the views are quite few.

I'm very critical about the pessimists, considering AI to be able to replace all the translators and interpreters. I've been supporting introducing AI in teaching phonetics and foreign languages in general. The thing is that only immoral cowards, chicken-hearted bourgeois intellectuals from Smolensk State University are afraid of losing their scientific degrees.

I interrogated Viktoria Petrovna Mikhalyova who told me about teaching French at Smolensk State University. All the recordings made in Tvardovsky library were leaked off. In 2021 I though that Mikhalyova isn't a supporter of decrepit and repressive methods of teaching, because she exclaimed against Lydmila Yurievna Mastykina. However, Mikhalyova was always quite hyspocritical, so she couldn't support me in the most burdensome years of my life. I plucked the mask from this Pharisee in 2024.

My critique of PhoneticFanatic

PhoneticFanatic is quite a poor vlogger, because his description of modern English phonology isn't scientifically correct. For instance, his video about rhoticity has got numerous mistakes. First of all, the so-called Transatlantic accent wasn't fully non-rhotic, only because this distinction between non-rhoticity and rhoticity wasn't significant at all. Secondly, the rhoticity had been variable from 1780 till 1850 in England. The video itself is too long, as always. All the videos are supposed to be useful for advanced learners and novices, although they're awfully stuffed with theory for beginners. I must also point out that his manners are quite atrocious.

However,I'd say that this blogger is the most influential popularizer of phonetics in Russia. My former Australian exchange partner from Tandem was very critical about his British accent, to say nothing of his American pronunciation.

Ababilov's channel

Alexei Ababilov is less professional and more amateurish in terms of making videos, but I find him quite a reasonable English learner, although in his video on acoustic phonetics, he definitely oversimplifies the material. I don't support Nikita Safronov's insane struggle with prescriptivism, because I'm not a great fan of Mikitko Alekseyev, a vlogger focused on slavistics. Abababilov's industry eneadered him to me, because the quality of his videos is the highest, in my opinion. In comformity with my experience of watching his videos. he's exceptionally educated, affable, compared to PhoneticFanatic and Afanasiev.

Safronov's crusade against learning and culture

In 2021, I conversed with Nikita Alekseyevich Safronov, a famous blogger who made lots of videos about linguistics. I watched very many videos with him. Initially, I was his supporter, for he was partially against this country's educational bureaucracy and decomposition. I consider his words about written speech and oral speech to be absolutely correct, but, in general, his reactionary philosophical views blighted him. At the first glance, he's nice and cultivated, but his coldness and insensibility betray the cad of the first water. To tell you the exact truth, some of his judgements, concerning the difference between written and oral speech, are ingeniously true. This opinion which was formulated in a scientific and dispassionate spirit is one the best arguments against Mastykina's insane passion for home reading and individual reading.

First of all, Safronov is certainly illiterate as a linguist because he can't understand that Ferdinand de Saussure's division between the language and the speech which has already become the belaboured truth. In other words, Safronov doesn't understand how the present-day labour division in the province of linguistic functions. Secondly, he's a poor specialist because of his exceeding passion for supporting local dialects and accents in press, mass media, although they've been disappearing, step by step. I'm also discontented that he should have made a shameful video, blackening the great reform of Russian orthography, which is quite a visible sign of obscurantism. From the objective point of view, the quality of Safronov's videos is very low, so he has been behaving, like a scammer.

The influence of Safronov's fascist political views caused his linguistic dogmatism and contempt to every different point of view. It must be confessed that his glorifying Dugin's polyglotism was pretty hurtful to the public sentiment. I'm therefore rejoiced that this clown of the first water lost his popularity. It must be also confessed that Safronov has got very strong ties with Ubermarginal whose fascist political views manifest themselves as openly as possible. As for Safronov, I must argue that he's been attempting to hide away his reactionary obscurantism with agnosticism, solipsism, objectivism.

Afanasiev and his illiteracy

In my opinion, Timofey Sergeevich Afanasiev, the head teacher of this school, is totally incompetent in terms of phonetics and accent reduction. As a vlogger, Afanasyev isn't a mediocrity because his approach to making videos is rather creative: I find his video about the Anglican community in Moscow very impressive. However, Afanasyev's influence on Russian audience is mainly harmful because of his exceeding illiteradeness and ignorance which pass comprehension, because he really considers General American to be much more authentic and more ancient than General British. In spite of several archaic traits, like rhoticity, it's quite impossible to call GA either more ancient or more authentic, mainly because the usage of these terms isn't purely scientific.

I must also point out that Afanasiev is quite boorish. His manners are also atrocious because he swears a lot, not no mention the episode from blue movies inserted in his videos. In a word, Timofey Sergeyevich pleases his audience with such a junk, in order to make the taste of his audience much more corrupted and vulgar. Earlier in his career, he issued lots of videos about English phonology, although his opinion on the soi-disant thick Russian accent is purely indefensible, because he really thinks that the ee vowels is a part and parcel of Russian accent.

My political views

 → Участник:Роман Сергеевич Сидоров/My political views

Frankly, my dream is to become a consistent marxist-leninist, even though my petty bourgeois mistakes and missteps object to doing so. For example, my clarion call for the violation of rules in my personal page in Russian Wikipedia in 2022 was a petty bourgeois, opportunistic mistake which led to the partial ban without a great uprising against the reactionary elements of Russian Wikipedia. Accordingly, it's very hard to tell whether my call for the general strike of German healthcare system in 2023 was also an opportunistic mistake or not. My opinion is if you're unable to become a revolutioneer, you simply must be an honest person who seeks to become a revolutioneer. I formulated this opinion whose importance goes beyond measure after reading Le Compagnon de Tour de France. The afore-mentioned novel is one of the most formulative literary productions in the hemisphere of my views.

In all the wikiprojects, I've been struggling with bourgeois objectivism, 'neutrality' since the beginning of my editing them. I'm always writing my Wikipedian articles in a militant, revolutionary spirit, even though my style of writing is often stylistically incorrect. My primary task in all the projects is to struggle with all the sorts and dyes of opportunism, petty bourgeois hysteria, reactionary propaganda. For instance, I'm one of critics of Keiser Cat Cinema because their conception of syndicalist revolution is purely idealistic, so IWW was quite unable to overthrow capitalism.

I'm very critical about the most of Russian left-wing vloggers because of their poor ties with the Russian labour movement. On the one hand, I strongly militate against the petty bourgeois opportunists, botches, and freeloaders, like Konstantin Syomin, Vasily Sadonin, Boris Ve, Egor Ivanov, Andrey Rudoy, Klim Zhukov and Oleg Komolov, Mikhail Vasiljevich Popov, Rebel Jack, Oleg Dvurechensky, and Stas Vasilyev. To tell the truth, Rebel Jack is my primary, foremost abhorrence because of his bad manners, badgering, bullying the vloggers, his reactionary aesthetic views (his extraordinary fancy for the Confederate States), and his insane petty bourgeois hysteria. Rebel Jack's illiteracy along with Uncle Joe's ignorance in the province of Soviet historiography go beyond comprehension because they didn't know that the Civil war in the United States had got a revolutionary character, so the Soviet historians thought this war to have been a part of the second bourgeois-democratic revolution in the United States. Stas Vasilyev thinks China to be a socialist nation, so, in my opinion, the afore-mentioned view betrays Vasilyev's childish illiterateness. In other words. Vasilyev's extreme illiterateness and indocility are surprising because the so-called Chinese People's Republic is just a barbarous degeneration of socialism. In brief, modern continental China is one of the cruellest imperialist states in the world.

The most dangerous figures of Russian 'marxist' vlogging

Komolov, Sadonin and Rudoy are definitely much more dangerous than Russian conservatives, liberals and social-democrats. If they accede to power some day, they'll perpetrate thousands of massacres, because they have nothing to do with communism and revolutionary labour movement. It must be confessed that Oleg Olegovich Komolov is especially violent because he oppressed lots of student. This reactionary petty bourgeois ideologist also pointed out that the universities should expel thousands of students yearly. Syomin's potential danger is less significant, although he agitated for the compulsary vaccination in the most caddish manner.

Polyakov's illiteracy

Among the petty bourgeois pacifists, my main abhorrence is Ivan Polyakov. First of all, he diminished the importance of progressive forces, the communist organizations inside Hollywood. Along with Syomin, he lauds the negative tendencies in early Soviet literature. It's obvious that my personal opinion on Soviet literature is positive, but it doesn't mean that copying mistakes of Soviet scholars is a nice thing. In brief, Syomin and Polyakov are just uncouth ignoramuses. It's blatantly obvious that they're not well-read. Syomin is especially disgusting because his polished voice irritates with very high intonations. Polyakov's video about Chernyshevsky is also full of parasitism because Polyakov has never analyzed primary sources, numerous recollections, so Sofya Vasilyevna Kovalevskaya's sketch about Chernyshevsky and his wife is much more valuable than the poorly made video by Polyakov. As for Syomin and Komolov, they're bourgeois intellectuals because their pacifism doesn't go beyond the borderline of laws. I don't say that videos with Syomin, Polyakov, Komolov are totally useless. On the contrary, their agitation for marxism is useful in a way, but their marxism isn't alive, because even Komolov, who's quite well-versed in economy, can't give a tip how to survive during the crisis. Funny to think, but I'm therefore much closer to marxism-leninism than them, because, at least, I wrote a couple of articles about the biggest strikes in history. Nevertheless, my articles about Indian general strikers haven't been widely read.

I also have an exceeding distate to Bors Yulin's channel,because Yulin is a highly uncultivated, ignorant freeloader, so the scientific significance of his videos is very poor, for this vlogger is used to making lots of very silly mistakes. I must also point out that Boris Vitalyevich Yulin praised Revolutionary Labour party, a trotskyist sect. I'm very disappointed that Yulin blackened Soviet literature, although it's evident to me, that Boris Vitalyevich isn't well-read at all. However, Yulin is certainly a pure angel, compared to Klim Zhukov's vulgarity. The thing is that Zhukov has been trying to become a know-all, so he pleases his audience with trifles.

My negative views on the imperialist policies of China doesn't expand to my views on the Chinese people because in every country people are diverse. If I had been a class-conscious Chinese worker during the coming World War, I would have contributed to the Chinese government's defeat. In 2024, I had got quite a serious political dispute with Nicolás Isaac, a Colombian fascist and pseudo-socialist, who was strongly against this sort of defeatism because of his insane careerism. At the same time, I must officially argue that there're lots of social-democrats, democratic socialists which have nothing to do with Nicolás Isaac's bigotry. The main issue is that the afore-mentioned Colombian is used to stuffing every conversation with politics, with his miserable flattery of servilism before exploiters. I wouldn't say that I hate this gentleman only because of his extremely reactionary political views. The main thing is that this insane blackguard forced me to work in quite a caddish manner.

Nicolás Isaac also defended and justified reactionary imperialist policies of continental China. At the same time, he's very critical about the Chinese revolutionary history, the most glorious days of Chinese civil war. In my opinion, this openly indefensible confessions proves that this 'comrade' is a nazist. This gue also has got strong ties with the most backward representatives of Russian intelligensia.

Nicolás Isaac's ignorance and the rarest lack of elementary education manifested itself when he talked about history. First of all, he despises primary sources, so he was used to giving me links with ready ideas which betrays quite an uneducated person in the province of history. Secondly, his taste in the province of literature is extremely vulgar because of his sincere and unvarying affection for Solzhenitsyn. It's also evident that Nicolás has never read classics and voluminous books in his life. This fascist also told me that I should work under very poor labour conditions, so, in my opinion, this person is as immoral and illiterate as Russian landlords and aristocrats, flogging their peasants. In other words, he's just an accessory of the most reactionary circles of Russian society, because forced labour has become more common in educational sphere.

The views of this Colombian are very close to those of Ezhi Saramat, a Russian troll, in the province of science. Obviously, they've nothing to do with science, because their contribution to science is certainly reduced to the cipher. The thing is that they're supporters of meritocracy, a set of reactionary dogmas.

The afore-mentioned Colombian also admitted that the Soviet Union was guilty in the Katyn Massacre. In other words, he's an ardent supporter of Goebbels, because it's Goebbels who composed this insanely stupid fable about the Soviet crimes. It's therefore evident that nazist views of Nicolás Isaac manifested itself as clearly as possible, when its comes to the Katyn massacre.

I'm also strongly against the reactionary hysteria, besmearing the popular use of AI, because, in my estimation, Artificial Intelligence may just change the present-day labour division. It's therefore evident to me, that Kiselyov's obscurantism is just a set of dogmas.

Unlike the above-mentioned chauvinists, I'm strongly against the reactionary imperialist bourgeoisie led by Putin because of his directly kazerne methods of governing. I've been also against Putin's direct turn to reaction and obscurantism. The reason why Putin's reactionary oligarchic regime is my abhorrence is the atrocities committed by his satraps, dealing with Russian pauper province, as if they're conquerors. It's that case when the word 'province' has got its original meaning. Beside my merciless critique of Putin's clique, I've been strongly against the fascist hysteria against immigrants, because this bestial hysteria fostered by Dugin and Malofeyev, prominent Russian nazists, militates against the class solidarity of all the workers. I'm used to criticizing Russian repressive laws mercilessly, because they're miserable fig tree leaves of reaction.

I'm strongly against the right-wing critique of neoliberalism, because without neoliberalism, we wouldn't have had the massive labour movement. At the same time, I'm an adversary of neolberals because of my conflict with top Wikipedians.

Despite the brilliant intellectual capacities, quite an impressive mental equipment, Oleg Komolov is a right-wing opportunist because of his ties with the Communist Party of Russian Federation. Popov, Rebel Jack, Dvurechensky, Vasilev have already become ultra-right opportunist, because their opportunism isn't even hidden away with a fig-tree leaf. The most dangerous form of opportunism is neocentrism represented by Rudoy, Boris Ve, Sadonin, Syomin. Open chauvinists, the likes of Vasilyev, are less dangerous. All the above forms of opportunism were caused by the poor ties with Russian labour movement.

So far as I'm strongly against trotskyism, I find Rudoy's attempt to bleach Trotsky is the refinest form of opportunism because Rudoy is definitely in between Stalin and Trotsky because he's likely to please his audience with this humbug. I quite agree that trotskysm in the late thirties has become the vanguard of fascism and reaction because trotskysts made lots of serious subversions during this historical period. I consider Khrushyov to have been a troskyist, an agent of the most reactionary circles of international financial capital. In my opinion, his barbarous dictatorship was caused by the serious structural changes inside the communist party.

As for the political parties, I'm very critical about the Communist Party of Russian Federation, for, since its foundation, the Central Committe of this political organization was in the hands of right-wing opportunists. I'm also critical about Mikhkail Popov's Workers' party. In the discussion, concerning the politics of Brazil, I expressed my scathing critique of Lula's treason of revolutionary movement in Brazil. In expressing such a thought, I pointed out, at the same time, that impossiblism in workers' politics is also quite harmful, sectarian. By expressing such a thought, I stigmatized Eugene T. Kingsley and Daniel De Leon.

My distaste to the degenerated communist movement in the sixties and the seventies also goes beyond measure.

Wikipedia and its reactionary obscurantism

Earlier I regretted that I should have made very serious left-wing opportunistic mistakes in Wikipedia. I called my writing multiple articles on labour movement is an entryism. I had been violating the rules of this community before I was caught by reactionary forces. However, in 2024, I sharpened my tactics with having made a couple of concessions to Wikipedia's censorship. At the same time, I wrote lots of passages about Mikhail Nikolayevich Atremenkov in a militant atheistic and revolutionary spirit. In this year, inspired with Prosper Mérimée's Colomba, I began the most consistent struggle with Smolensk State University, so I decided to collect materials to blacken my former university.

I wouldn't say that I'm still violating the rules of Wikipedia, but I have just a very strong distaste to the method of writing articles. In my opinion, Wikipedia's influence on the public sentiment is awfully harmful, because the usage of secondary sources in the course of writing articles. It's blatantly obvious that the class struggle against this website is vitally important because Wikipedia flagrantly violates the most elementary human rights. Since 2022, this organization has been becoming more and more reactionary. Its support for German nazism (they brainwash their readers with Goebbels' version of Katyn massacre) emerged much earlier, though. I must also point out that RuWiki is the same reactionary backwater, with the same degree of obscurantism, not to mention the same support for Goebbels' version. Say rather, its neutrality is much more harmful than the openly reactionary views in the corresponding article in Wikipedia. It's therefore evident to me, that the class struggle against the both encyclopedias is equally important.

Aprel Wiki and its reactionary policies

In 2024, I became a member of editorial in aprel.wiki. Initially, I didn't pay attention to their passion for Atomic Heart, but, step by step, I have been becoming much more class-conscious. After having realized that big shots from the editorial of aprel-wiki humiliated critics of Atomic Heart, I decided to break the ties with the project because Atomic Heart is my abhorrence. I decided to do so after they'd clean my article about my former uni from scathing revolutionary criticism revealing the exact truth about crimes committed inside the walls of Smolensk State University.

Marxist Literature

So far as I has been banned in Viktor Sergeyev's 'marxist' library, I have been trying to resist the monopoly of fascists on marxist literature. In twenty twenty one, I talk a lot to Viktor Sergeyev, the administrator of the corresponding 'library', a sectarian community in the VK. He proved to extremely illiterate and incompetent in the province of history and philosophy, for his views were greatly influenced by agnosticism, although, at the first glance, he In this community, Sergeyev's team publicize only the Soviet literature, for they've no organizational ties, owing to their openly nazist views. In twenty twenty four, I began digitalizing books which may be used by pupils and university students.

Chinese pseudomarxism

So far as the Chinese 'communists' falsify marxist theory in order to brainwash non-partisan masses, I'm always trying to read the primary sources and original writings while studying history and economics. Dialectical materialism being consistent empeirism, according to Maurice Cornforth, I'm used to proving all the theories, hypotheses, suggestions, with analysing primary sources in all the sciences.

According to the marxist-leninist conception of party formation, I'm not a communist. It's also quite impossible to call me a marxist-leninist, for I have contributed nothing to the marxist theory. Petty bourgeois democrats, trotskyists, social-democrats, reformist socialists, and all the opportunists are used to calling me a communist, a marxist, a stalinist, although, first of all, I consider the term 'stalinism' to be derogatory. Secondly, the opinion of opportunistic non-vanguardists is entirely incorrect, because I'm not a member of communist party, owing to the great decline of Russian labour movement. At the same time, I'm used to exclaiming against petty bourgeois elements agents of imperialism inside the revolutionary labour movement, but all my statements against them aren't original and independent.

Why I am totally apolitical

So far as I belong to the semi-decomposed and semi-declassed category of working class (the main cause of my backwardness is rather a low concentration of labour in the most of Smolensk region industrial enterprises), my cultural and political backwardness makes me inclined to decadent and formalistic tendencies in art and literature, although my decadence is certainly a reddish one. What I mean by that is my social status is extremely close to that of petty bourgeois intelligentzia. In marxist theory, I'm quite unable to surpass my petty bourgeois democratism and dogmatism, owing to my very poor ties with working masses. In social issues, I'm quite pessimistic, hysterical, and disabled, like very many layers of petty bourgeois intelligentzia. Because of my inability of being creative in the province of marxist theory, I'm much more focused upon finding and publicizing primary sources.

My interests

 → Участник:Роман Сергеевич Сидоров/Interests

My personal interests include acoustical phonetics, lexicography, English grammar, translating as a job, English phonology, marxism-leninism, labour history, sawing birches and brooms, plumbing, physical anthropology, physics, mathematics, films with Vivien Leigh, all the films with Greta Garbo and Charlie Chaplin, ancient revolutionary history, Russian revolutionary literature. The main interests concern phonetics and accent reduction in English and French , labour strikes and labour uprisings in Europe and America.

I'd say that I'm not very interested in literature. The point is that I think literature is very important in terms of improving my temper. The problem is that I've already made a great deal of childish mistakes in my life. Some of them were very tragical because I greatly hurt my relatives. Not that I'm a very unpleasant blackguard, but my temper needs repairing and improving, so to say.

As for languages, I like learning British English, Standard French. I'd restore my brilliant knowledge of Latin, but I'm not sure whether it's possible or not. I'm very skeptical about polyglotism, so I'm not gonna become a polyglot. All my interests are confined to the French and Anglo-American community. I guess, it may be confessed that I'm fond of Germanic and Romance languages, even though this interest is mainly confined to their phonology.

As for my professional interests, I'm deeply interested in articulatory phonetics, acoustic analysis of speech, British English phonetics and phonology. I'm sort of interested in non-native pronunciation of English (Swedish, German accents), dialectology (old-timey non-rhotic New England English), diachronical phonology, phonostylistics.

I'm not a fan of military history, though I just adore 'Under Military Law' with Ekaterina Klimova, and, accordingly, I respect the heroic deeds of my ancestors, including my grandfather. As for history, I'm interested in the ancient history and Roman aesthetics. As for Russian movies about the Great Patriotic war, they cause vomiting, in my opinion, because these cheap movies besmear the heroic deeds of our ancestors. It's therefore vitally important that I should point out that 'Under Military Law' is an exception.

Tandemians are used to calling me a weirdo because of my extremely weird and funny plans.

My tastes

Music

 → Участник:Роман Сергеевич Сидоров/My tastes

I just adore Vera Lynn, Julie Andrews, Elton Hayes, Bing Crosby, Rosemarie Clooney, the Andrews sisters, the Barry Sisters and Evgenia Smolyaninova. Sometimes, Julie Andrews is really weird, but her vocal faculties are incredibly impressive. My opinion on Marni Nixon is very contradictory, because I'm not a fan of opera singers, and, accordingly, Marni Nixon resembles an opera singer, just a smidgen. I'm very critical about modern formalist tendencies in music (rap, hiphop) because, in my opinion. these kinds of music reflect the views of lumpfen-proletariat. I'm not against opera, although it seems to be that opera isn't my cup of tea. I adore Ingeborg Hallstein, though. In a word, opera isn't my abhorrence, so I might maintain the conversation, concerning opera, for I read 'Consuelo', one of the bost novels of George Sand.

I'm also fond of Edith Piaf whose civil virtues exceed the artistic ones, Rosalie Dubois, Mario Lanza, Kathryn Grayson, Gina Lollobrigida.

Cinema

As is known, I'm a zealous cinephile, so I'm used to downloading films from kinozal.ru and yts.pm. In 2023, I created an account in IMBD.

In December 2022, I discussed cinema with American petty bourgeois intellectuals. I'd say that I'm shocked with their mean tastes, with their ignorance and stupidity. In January 2023, I was banned in Straight Dope Board Message Board because I asked the users of this site about one of Voynich's novels. In December, I was attacked by the great number of silly, dopey, besotted and addle-brained American trolls who hated Russia and Russian culture. They blamed me in Russian nationalism, even though I'm not a nationalist at all. The uneducated trolls just showed their inability to formulate even simple thoughts. Their linguistic carpings were very numerous. In 2024, my views on cinema were mainly metaphysical. these views were the main cause of all my broodings, although in 2025, my views have become more dialectical and less metaphysical.

First of all, petty bourgeois trolls are quite unable to understand my thoughts clearly, even though I've been trying to explain all the details of my personal viewpoint. For instance, in their opinion, I think that all the old movies are much better than modern ones. Say rather, I think that the costumes in Camille, a film shot in the thirties, were very bad, although it's possible to watch this old film because of very talented Robert Tailor and Greta Garbo. However, American trolls just ignore all these pieces of information, just because they're a set of miserable ignorant bourgeois intellectuals.

In my estimation, the classical Hollywood movies were much better, so I prefer watching Anglo-American classical cinema. It appears to be that Katherine Hepburn is one is my most favourite actress, because I'm used to asking questions of her biography and her speech in various foreign forums, in Youtube. However, my tastes are overly continental, because Greta Garbo is definitely my most favourite actress.

I've been a great fan of non-rhotic accents, so I'm always using Transatlantic accent (absolutely non-rhotic), RP, Estuary English and Cockney, from time to time.